Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Yazd, Iran

2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, PB 76169-133, Iran

3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

4 Graduate Ms.c of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

10.26655/ijabbr.2016.2.2

Abstract

A Camel Research Station was established in 1990 at the central desert land of Iran named Kavir-e-loot, to evaluate productivity performance of one humped camel. The data consisted of birth weights (BW), three (W3), six (W6), nine (W9) months and yearling (W12) body weight of animals and the pedigree was registered during a period of 14 years since 1991 to 2004. The body weight traits of birth, three, six, nine months and yearling of camel calves were genetically analyzed using multiple trait animal models. The results showed low to moderate heritability for all of the studied traits. The lowest and highest value were for three 0.13 ±0.14 and six months 0.330.17, respectively. The genetic correlation between six months and yearling body weight was 0.47 0.38 which is lower than between six to nine months body weight, 0.79 0.37. The variances of common maternal effects for body weights were moderate For summer weights three, six, and nine months body weights, and high for winter, birth and yearling weight. The genetic parameter estimates indicated that the six months weight can be used as a selection tool for genetic improvement of growth traits considering its higher heritability and positive genetic correlations with succeeding growth traits.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Al-Sobayil, K.A., Khalil, M.H., Al-Jobeile, H.S., Mohamed, K.M., Salal, S.A., 2006. Quantitive genetic analyses and evaluation for early growth performance in Saudi Camels. Inter. Sci. Conf. Camel., 4, 1759-1771.
Banerjee, A.K., 2006. Studies on the camels in Eritrea: Management and productivity. Inter. Sci. Conf. Camel., 4, 2312-2318.
Brigitte, A.K., 2005. Reproductive performance of camels (Camelus dromedarius) under pastoral management and its influence on herd development. Live. Pro. Sci., 92, 17-29.
Emami Meybodi, M.A., 2006. Productive performance of Iranian one humped camel, fattening breed. Inter. Sci. Conf. Camel., 4, 2232-2236.
FAO, 2011. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org.
Gabriel, B., Trifonov, V.A., Biltueva, L.S., Brien, C.M., Alkalaeva, E.S., Fu, B., Skidmore, J.A., Allen, T., 2007. Crossspecies chromosome painting among camel, cattle, pig and human: further insights into the putative Cetartiodactyla ancestral karyotype. Chr. Res., 15, 499–515.
Ghasemi Meymandi, M., Mohammadabadi, M.R., Esmailizadeh, A.K., 2015. Genetic variation of camels in the North of Kerman province using microsatellite markers. Anim. Pro. Res., 4, 35-45.

Gizachew, A., Teha, J., Birhanu, T., 2014. Review on medicinal and nutritional values of camel milk. Nat. Sci., 12, 35- 40.
Hermas, S., 2006. Descriptive and reproductive characteristic of the Libyan camel herds. Inter. Sci. Conf. Camel., 4, 2222-2232.
Meyer, K., 2000. DFREML: Program to estimate variance components by restricted maximum likelihood, using a derivative-free algorithm. User Notes. Ver 3. Anim Genet & Breed, Unit. Armidle. NSW.
Safaa, O., Suliman, S.H., Khojali, M.E., 2013. Effect of heat treatment on some mineral status of camel milk. J. Anim. Sci., 2, 4-5.
Salehi, M., Taherpour, N., Sarhaddi, F., Lotfollahnia, B., 2009. Evalution of fiber and skin characteristics from camel hybrid and its comparison with one hump camel . Inter. Sci. Conf. Camel., 1, 10.
SAS Institute Inc. 1997. Cary, Nc. USA.
Zarate, A.V., 1996. Breeding strategies for marginal regions in the tropics and subtropics. Anim. Res. Develop., 30, 25-36.