Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor of forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran

2 M.Sc. student of forestry, University of Tehran, Kraj, Iran

3 Ph.D student of forestry, University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran

4 M.Sc. Graduate of forestry, University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province is one of the 31 provinces of Iran and located on the southwestern part of the country. Its capital is Shahrekord. It has an area of 16,332 square kilometers and a population of 857,910. To study of human development used the Surplus Biocappacity (SB) and Human Development Index (HDI). This research accrued in the shahr-e-kord, Boroojen, Farsan, Ardal, Lordegan and Kohrang region (chaharmehal va Bakhtiari Province). our research used the raw data in related the Surplus Biocappacity (SB) and Human Development Index (HDI) include number of death, student in the primary, guidance, high school, tertiary and number of Adult Literacy in the calendar of 2010 year. Results showed that the quantity of human development index and sub- index in the shahr-e-kord was higher the other region of chaharmehal va Bakhtiari Province, but this index in the Kohrang region was lowest quantity. because the the quantity of family income, level of education and life Expectancy index in this region are lowest in the chaharmehal va Bakhtiari Province. Other region of province arranged the Boroojen (17%), Lordegan (17%), Farsan (13%) and Ardal (12%) have a maximum of effect on the human development. Overall results showed that the shahr-e-kord (center of chaharmehal va Bakhtiari Province) has a maximum of human development, and Kohrang region have a minimum of human development. Authors suggested increasing the human development of Kohrang region more focused in this region and determinate the more financial resource and managements.

Keywords

De la Escosura. L., (2013). Human development in Africa: A long-run perspective. Explorations in Economic History 50, 179–204.

Faber. JF. (1982). Life tables for the United States: 1900-2050. Actuarial study no. 87. Baltimore: Social Security Administration, (SSA publication no. 11-11534 Web of Science).

HARTTGEN. K., KLASEN. S., (2012). A Household-Based Human Development Index. World Development 40(5), 878–899.

Hicks. D., (1997). the inequality-adjusted human development index: A constructive proposal. World Development, 25 (8), 1283–1298.

Macdonell. WR. (1913).  On the expectation of life in ancient Rome, and in the provinces of Hispania and Lusitania, and Africa. Biometrika, 9,366-380

McNeill. WH., (1976). Plagues and peoples. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Press,

McGillivray. M., (1991). The human development index: Yet another redundant composite development indicator. World Development, 9(10), 1461–1468.

Morse. S., (2003). For better or for worse, till the human development index do us part. Ecological Economics, 45(2), 281-296.

Neumayer. E., (2001), the human development index and sustainability — a constructive proposal. Ecological Economics, 39(1), 101-114.

Noorbakhsh. F., (1998), A Modified Human Development Index. World Development, 26 (3), 517-528.

Olshansky. SJ., Carnes. BA., (1996), Prospects for extended survival: a critical review of the biological evidence. In: Caselli G, Lopez AD, eds. Health and mortality among elderly populations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 39-58.

Ravallion. M,, (2012), Troubling tradeoffs in the Human Development Index. Journal of Development Economics, 99, 201–209.

Sagar. A., Najam. A., (1998). The human development index: a critical review. Ecological Economics, 25 (3), 249-264.

United Nations Development Program [UNDP], (1990). Human Development Report. Oxford University Press, New York.

United Nations Development Program. Human development report, (1999), 159–63.

United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Human development report: making new technologies work for human development. New York: Oxford University Press, (2001). p. 9–25.