Document Type: Original Article


1 Young Researchers and Elite club, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

2 Graduate of Animal science, Islamic Azad University Shahrekourd branch, Iran


Objective: This study carried out to monitor the status of nutritional management and measuring difference between present and desired feeding system in dairy cattle of rural conditions of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari. Methods: 334 rural flocks consisting of 1442 dairy cows were selected from seven towns of this province. The experiment was lasted for in a year and using completely randomized design. Data of feed intake and production obtained directly and measured monthly. Feed intake sample was collected from all dairy farms and then the amount of nutrients was determined in laboratory.  Results: Results showed that type of township had significant effect on net energy lactation (NEL), crude protein percentage (%CP), as well as calcium and phosphor percentage (p<0.05). Highest mean of crude protein percentage (%13.10±0.59) and NEL (1.33±0.03 Mcal/d) belonged to Shahrekord township. Results showed that calcium and phosphor levels received in all units under study were less than the amounts recommended in National Research Council (NRC 2001). So that, Ardal township with %0.66±0.04 and Shahrekord with %0.38±0.01 respectively had highest levels of these two elements as compared to other township. Statistically significant difference was observed between various townships regarding the amounts of Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) (p<0.05). Numerically, highest and lowest % NDF belonged to Ardal township (%53.74±1.32) and Shahrekord township (%41.31±0.77), respectively. % ADF in Ardal, Borujen, Shalamzar, Shahrekord, Farsan, Kouhrang, and Lordegan were gained %37.24±0.97, %30.67±0.74, %31.60±1.06, %28.59±0.64, %29.66±0.85, %31.56±1.18, and %30.34±0.91, respectively. These indicate the imbalance of dairy cows rations in rural areas. Conclusions: Results obtained in this study indicate that the dairy cattle, based on the recommendations of the NRC, 2001 with a deficiency of protein, minerals and fiber are facing excess usage.   


Abd El-Hadi AH, Aly AMA, Attiat AA, Zidan MA, zahran F (2002). Response of sugar beet to various forms and rates of nitrogen fertilizer. Egyptian J. Soil Sci., (4): 643-658.
Abo-El-Goud SMM (2000). Agronomic studies on fodder beet. Ph.D. thesis, Fac. Agric. Mansoura University. Alimadadi A, Jahansouz MR, Besharati H, Tavakol Afshari R (2010 ).Evaluating the effects of phosphate solubilizingmicroorganisms, mycorrhizal fungi and seed priming on nodulation of chickpea. Iranian Journal of Soil Research (Formerly Soil and Water Sciences), 24 (1): 44-53.
Ardakani MR (2009). Ecology. Tehran University press, Iran.
Beyranvand H, Farnia A, Nakhjavan SH, Shaban M (2013). Response of yield and yield components of maize (Zea maiz L.) to different bio fertilizers. International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. Volume
1, Issue 9: 1068-1077.
Favilli F, Pastorelli R, Gori A (1993). Response of sugar beet toAzospirillumbacterization in field experiments. Agric. Mediterr. 123:281-285.
Ibiene AA, Agogbua JU, Okonko IO, Nwachi GN (2012). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as biofertilizer: Effect on growth of Lycopersicum esculentus. Journal of American Science 8(2):318-324.
Kandil AA, Badawi MA, El-Moursy SA, Abdou UA (2004). Effect of planting dates, nitrogen levels and biofertilization treatments on 1: Growth attributes of sugar beet. Scientific journal of king faisal university. Vol.5 1425.

Kiani, M, Farnia, A.,and Shaban, M. (2013). Changes of seed yield, seed protein and seed oil in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under application of fertilizers. International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. Volume 1, Issue 10: 1170-1178.
Mrkovack N, Milic V.2001.UseofAzotobacterchroococcum as potentially useful in agricultural application. Annals of Microbiology, 51, 145-158.
(4): 995-1012.
Nemeat-Alla, E.A.E; A.I. Badr and M.F.M. Ibrahim (2007). Macro-element requirements of sugar beet. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 32 (1): 8849-8857.
Ramadan AGAMY, Mohamed HASHEM, Saad ALAMRI (2013). Effect of soil amendment with yeasts as biofertilizers on the growth and productivity of sugar beet. African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 8(1), pp. 46-56.
Ramakrishnan K, Selvakumar G (2012). Effect of biofertilizers on enhancement of growth and yield on  Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.). International
Journal of Research in Botany. 2(4): 20-23. Sadeghi-Shoae M, Paknejad F, Hassanpour H, Mozafari H, Moharramzadeh M, Tookalloo MR (2013). Effect of
intermittent furrow irrigation, humic acid and deficit irrigation on water use efficiency of sugar beet. Annals of Biological Research, 4 (3):187-193.
Saif-Laila MA (1991). Yield and quality of sugar beet as affected by nitrogen sources and rate of some microelements in Kafer EL-Sheikh. Ph. D. thesis, Fac. of Agric. Ain Shams Univ.
Shaban M (2013a). Application of seed equilibrium moisture curves in agro physics. International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 1(9): 885-898.
Shaban M (2013b). Biochemical aspects of protein changes in seed physiology and germination. International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 1(8): 885-898.