Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran

2 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran


According to flexibility of pneumatic conveying systems with respect to other types of transmission systems, this system has wide application in industry and agriculture processes. One important application of this system is in the loading and unloading tankers and powdery bulk materials such as trucks carrying cement, plaster and sand. Conveying efficiency is associated with pressure, which increases the pressure drop in the pipe, operational efficiency will be reduced. This work presents a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculation to predict and evaluate the influence of the pipes type and the inlet mass flow rate on the pressure drop and velocity fields during pneumatic conveying of wheat. The numerical solutions were carried out using spreadsheet and commercial CFD code Ansys Fluent 14.5. The CFD simulations predict excellently the pressure drop and velocity field under different pipe types and inlet mass flow rate. Pressure drop were estimated to be 2780, 3120, and 3360 pa for mass flow rates of 4.33, 5.77 and 8.66 kg/s respectively in Steel pipes. Also there were 2940, 3240 and 3390 for polyethylene pipe that showed the maximum pressure drop in polyethylene pipes is higher than the steel pipes.


Main Subjects

R. Pan.,1999. Material properties and flow modes in pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 104: 157ñ163
A. Rezvanivand Fanayi. A. M . Nikbakht. 2015. A CFD Study of the Effects of Feed Diameter on the Pressure Drop in A cyclone Separator. International Journal of Food Engineering. 11: 71ñ77
H. Kalman., 2000. Attrition of powders and granules at various bends during pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology112: 244ñ250
N. Huber, M. Sommerfeld, 1998. Modelling and numerical calculation of dilute-Phase pneumatic conveying in pipe systems, Powder Technology 99: 90ñ101.
M.M. Enayet, M.M. Gibson, A.M.P.K. Taylor, M. Yianneskis. 1982. Laser-Doppler measurements of laminar and turbulent flow in a pipe bend, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 3 : 213ñ219.
Ansys Fluent, Ansys Fluent 12, userís guide, Fluent Incorporated.
KlinzingG.E., RizkF., Marcus R., and . Leung L.S, (2010), pneumatic conveying of solids, A theoretical and practical approach, third edition, Springer publications
GuahT.G.,Gimbun J., Thomas ChoongS.Y. (2006). A CFD study of the effect of cone dimensions on sampling aerocyclones performance and hydrodynamics , Powder Technology, 162, 126-132.
J.D. Hilbert, The Bat of Bulk Solids Handling, Pneumatic Conveying of Bulk Powders vol. 0/86 Tram Tech Publications, Clansthal-Zellerfeld, Germany, 1980, pp. 107-110.
R.D. Marcus, ID. Hilbert, G.E. Klinziug, The Best a Bulk Solids Handling, Pneumatic Conveying of Bulk Powders vol. D/86 Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal-Zellmfeld, Germany, 1985, pp. 121-126.
R.D. Marcus, C Wiggill, P. Ria, The Best of Bulk Solids Handling, Pneumatic Conveying of Bulk Powders vol. 0/86 Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany, 1985, pp. 17-24
V.K. Agarwall, D. Mils,J.D. Mason, The Best of Bulk Solids Handling, Pneumatic Conveying of Bulk Powders vol. D/86 Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany, 1985, pp. 111-116.
C.B. Weinberger, M.T. Shn Powder Technology 08 (1986)19.
T.A. Bell, A. Boxman, 1.B. Jacobs, Proceedings of The 5th wmia Congress of Chemical Engineering, San Meg, USA vol. V 1996, pp. 238-243.
H. Kalman, 0. Goder, Proceedings of the 5th World Congers of Chemical Engineering, San Diego, USA vol. VI 1996, pp. 011-016.
K. Aced, 0. Goder, H. Kalman, A. Zvieli, Powder Handling and Proceming 9 (1997) 345-308.