Document Type: Review Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Arid and Mountainous Regions Reclamation, Faculty of Natural Resource, University of Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Student of Desertification, Faculty of Natural Resource, University of Tehran, Iran

3 M.Sc. Expert in Management of Desertification, Faculty of Natural Resource, University of Tehran, Iran

10.26655/ijabbr.2018.1.2

Abstract

Keeping the water table at a favorable level is quite significant for a sustainable management of groundwater plans. Various management measures need to know the spatial and temporal behavior of groundwater. Therefore, the measurement of groundwater levels are generally carried out at spatially random locations in the field; whereas, most of the groundwater models requires these measurement at a pre-specified grid. Geostatistical techniques could produce an accurate map of groundwater level. Naishaboor plain with 4190 sq km was selected due to presence of over 48 observation wells, mostly with more than 20 years of record. A universal kriging and co-kriging - with level of surface as auxiliary variable - estimator has been used to model groundwater level for three kind of climate condition (wet, normal and dry) and three levels (maximum, average and minimum). The result showed the Gaussian model selected as the best variogram. Furthermore, the RMSE and MRE indicated that kriging method was more accurate than co-kriging in mapping the groundwater level; although, there was not distinct difference.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Aboufirassi, M., Marino, M.A., 1983. Kriging of water levels in the souss aquifer Morocco. Math. Geol., 15, 537-551.

Ahmadi, S.H., Sedghamiz, A., 2008. Application and evaluation of kriging and cokriging methods on groundwater depth mapping. Environ. Monit. Assess., 138, 357-368.

Ahmed, S., de Marsily, G., 1989. Cokriged estimates of transmissivities using jointly water level data, In: Armstrong, M., (ed.), Geostatistic, Kluwer Academic Pub., 2, 615-628.

Araghinejad, S., Burn, D.H., 2005. Probabilistic forecasting of hydrological events using geostatistical analysis. Hydrol. Sci. J., 50, 837-856.

ASCE Task Committee, 1990a. Review of geostatistics in geohydrology, I: Basic concepts. J. Hydraul. Eng. (ASCE), 116, 612-632.

ASCE Task Committee, 1990b. Review of geostatistics in geohydrology, II: Applications. J. Hydraul. Eng. (ASCE), 116, 633-658.

Bardossy, A., Lehmann, W., 1998. Spatial distribution of soil moisture in a small catchment. Part I: Geostatistical analysis. J. Hydrol., 206, 1-15.

Bastin, G., Lorent, B., Duque, C., Gevers, M., 1984. Optimal estimation of the average rainfall and optimal selection of raingage locations. Water Resour. Res., 20(4), 463-470.

Berndtsson, R., Chen, H., 1994. Variability of soil water content along a transect in a desert area. J. Arid Environ., 27, 127-139.

Burgess, T.M., Webster, R., 1980. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties, I: The semivariogram and punctual kriging. J. Soil Sci., 31, 315-331.

Cambardella, C.A., Moorman, T.B., Novak, J.M., Parkin, T.B., Karlen, D.L., Turco, R.F., 1994. Field scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 1501-1511.

Chirlin, G.R., Dagan, G., 1980. Theoretical head variogram for steady flow in statistically homogeneous aquifers. Water Resour. Res., 16(6), 1001-1015.

Christensen, R., 1990. Linear models for multivariate, time, and spatial data. Springer, New York.

Coram, J., Dyson, P., Evans, R., 2001. An evaluation framework for dryland salinity, report prepared for the National Land & Water Resources Audit (NLWRA), sponsored by the Bureau of Rural Sciences, National Heritage Trust, NLWRA and National Dryland Salinity Program, Australia.

Creutin, J.D., Obled, C., 1982. Objective analysis and mapping techniques for rainfall fields: An objective comparison. Water Resour. Res., 18, 413-431.

David, M., 1977. Geostatistical ore reserve estimation. Developments in Geomathematics 2. Elsevier (Amsterdam), 364p.

Delhomme, J.P., 1978. Kriging in the hydroscience. Adv. Water Resour., 1, 251-266.

Gamma Design Software, 2005. GS+ Geostatistics for the environmental science version 7.0. Gamma Design software L.L.C., Plainwell, Michigan, USA.

Germann, U., Joss, J., 2001. Variograms of radar reflectivity to describe the spatial continuity of apline precipitation. J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 1042-1059.
Goovaerts, P., 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gundogdu, K.S., Guney, I., 2007. Spatial analysis of groundwater levels using universal kriging. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 116(1), 49-55.

Hoseini, A., Farajzadeh, M., Velayati, S., 2005. The water cresis analyses from the approach of environmental in the Neishaboor plain. Research committee of water organization of Khorasan Razavi province.

Isaaks, E., Srivastava, R.M., 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kitanidis, P.K., 1997. Introduction to geostatistics: Application to hydrogeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kumar, D., Ahmed, S., 2003. Seasonal behaviour of spatial variability of groundwater level in a granitic aquifer in monsoon climate. Curr. Sci., 84, 188-196.

Kumar, V., 1996. Space time modeling of ground water with assistance of remote sensing. Ph.D. Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.
Kumar, V., Remadevi, 2006. Kriging of groundwater levels - A case study. J. Spatial Hydrol., 6(1), 81-90.

Report of Water Resources Balance of Neishaboor Plain, 1998. Water organization of Khorasan Razavi province, Mashhad, Iran.

Storm, B., Jenson, K.H., Refsgaard, R.C., 1988. Estimation of catchment rainfall uncertainty and its influence on runoff prediction. Nord. Hydrol., 19, 79-88.

Velayati, S., Tavassoli, S., 1991. The resources and the problems of Khorasan's water. Astane Ghodse Razavi, Mashhad, Iran.

Vieira, S.R., Nielsen, D.R., Biggar, J.W., 1981. Spatial variability of field measured infiltration rate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 45, 1040-1048.

Virdee, T.S., Kottegoda, N.T., 1984. A brief review of kriging and its application to optimal interpolation and observation well selection. Hydrol. Sci. J., 29, 367-387.

Volpi, G., Gambolati, G., 1978. On the use of main trend for the kriging technique in hydrology. Adv. Water Resour., 1, 345-349.

White, J.G., Welch, R.M., Norvell, W.A., 1997. Soil zinc map of the USA using geostatistics and geographic information systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61(1), 185-194