Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 MS in Agroecology, University of Razi, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Associate Prof Faculty of Agriculture, University of Razi Kermanshah, Iran

3 Ph.D. Students in Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

4 MS in Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Esfahan, Iran

Abstract

The experiment was carried out in a factorial arrangement with the base of randomized complete block design in three repetitions. The first factor consisted of 11 bed for eating worm and the second factor is the different seasons (spring and autumn) respectively. Traits was including number of capsules (Coconut), the number of adult worms, the number of immature worms, live worms masses (mg), maximum weight per worm (mg) and the average number of outgoing cases per capsule (Coconut), respectively. The results showed that the interaction between the incubator × seasons was significant for all traits. So the highest average in 80% sheep manure + wheat straw 20% was observed in the spring.It wasconclude that changes in different contexts breeding seasons and has a great effect on the measured traits Maximum biomass, maximum activity was obtained in the spring mating and the number of capsules and the season tiny capsules Unexpectedly a winter was produced by the adult worm

Keywords

Main Subjects

Albuzio A, Concheri G, Nardi S, Dell’Agnola G (1994). Effect of humic fractions of different molecular size on the development of oat seedlings grown in varied nutritional conditions. In: Senesi, N.,Mianom,
T.M. (Eds.), Humic Substances in the Global Environment and Implications on Human Health. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 199–204.
Atiyeh RM, Dominguez J, Subler S, Edwards CA (2000). Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia andrei) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia 44, 709–724.
Casenave de Sanfilippo E, Arguello JA, Abdala G, Orioli GA (1990). Content of Auxin-, inhibitor- and Gibberellin-like substances in humic acids. Biologia Plantarum 32, 346–351.
Cavender ND, Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA (1999). Influence of vermicomposts on arbuscular mycorrhizal infection of Sorghum bicolor and plant growth. In: 2nd International Soil Ecology Conference Abstract, Chicago, Il, p. 23.
Chen Y, Aviad T (1990). Effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: McCarthy, P., Clapp, C.E., Malcolm, R.L., Bloom, P.R. (Eds.), Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Readings. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 161–186.
Dell’Agnola G, Nardi S (1987). Hormone-like effect and enhanced nitrate uptake induced by depolycondensed humic fractions obtained from Allolobophora rosea and A. caliginosa faeces. Biology and Fertility of Soils 4, 115–118.
Domínguez J, Velando J, Aira M, Monroy F (2003). Uniparental reproduction of Eisenia fetida and E. Andrei (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae): evidence of self-insemination. Pedobiologia. No. 47. pp.530-534
Doube BM, Williams PML, Willmott PJ (1997). The influence of two species of earthworm (Aporrectodea trapezoides and Aporrectoedea rosea) on the growth of wheat, barley and faba beans in three soil types in the greenhouse. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29, 503–509.
Elvira C, Sampedro L, Benitezm E, Nogales R (1998). Vermicomposting of sludges from paper mill and dairy industries with Eisenia andrei: a pilot-scale study. Bioresource Technology 63, 205–211.
Evans AC, Guild WJ (1948). Studies on the relationships between earthworms and soil fertility. V. Field population. Ann. Appl. Biol. 35, 485-493.
Fernandez LLC, Rojas ANG, Carrillo RTG, Islas RME, Martinez ZHG, Hernandez UR, Avila RJR, Hernandez FD, Ortega AJM (2006). Manual of analysis techniques of soils applied to remediation of polluted places. SEMARNAT, INE, IMP. 177p.
Gilot C (1997). Effects of a tropical geophageous earth worm, anomaly (Megascolecidae), on soil characteristics and production of a yam crop in Ivory Coast. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29, 353–359.
Gupta R, Garg VK (2008). Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting. Journal Hazard Material. 153: 1023–1030.Beyginiya et al 
Kahsnitz HG (1992). Investigations on the influence of earthworms on soil and plant. Botanical Archives 1, 315–331.
Kale RD (1998). Earthworms:nature’s gift for utilization of organic wastes. In: Edwards, C.A. (Ed.), Earthworm Ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 355–377.
Krishnamoorthy RV, Vajranabhiah SN (1986). Biological activity of earthworm casts: An assessment of plant growth promotor levels in casts. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Animal Science) 95, 341–351.
Mylonas VA, Mccants CB (1980). Effects of humic and fulvic acids on growth of tobacco. I. Root initiation and elongation. Plant and Soil 54, 485–490.
Nakamura Y (1996). Interactions between earthworms and microorganisms in biological control of plant root pathogens. Farming Japan 30, 37–43.
Phuong HK, Tichy V (1976). Activity of humus acids from peat as studied by means of some growth regulator bioassays. Biologia Plantarum 18, 195–199.
Subler S, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (1998). Comparing vermicomposts and composts. BioCycle 39, 63– 66.
Suthar S (2009). Vermicomposting of vegetable-market solid waste using Eisenia fetida: Impact of bulking material on earthworm growth and decomposition rate. Ecology Enginery. 35: 914-920.
Tan KH, Tantiwiramanond D (1983). Effect of humic acids on nodulation and dry matter production of soybean, peanut, and clover. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47, 1121–1124.
Thankamani CK, Sivaraman K, Kandiannan K (1996). Response of clove (Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & Perry) seedlings and black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) cuttings to propagating media under nursery conditions. Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops 5, 99–104.
Valdrighi MM, Pera A, Agnolucci M, Frassinetti S, Lunardi D, Vallini G (1996). Effects of compostderived humic acids on vegetable biomass production and microbial growth within a plant (Cichorium intybus)-soil system: a comparative study. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 58, 133–144.