Document Type : Original Article


Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran


Combining ability effects were estimated for different agronomic characters in line × tester crossing program comprising 21 hybrids produced by crossing 7 lines and 3 testers. Parents and hybrids differed significantly for general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects, respectively. The variance due to GCA and SCA showed that gene action was predominantly additive for number of branches. This characters may further be improved through simple selection method in early generation, whereas predominance of non-additive gene action was discovered for plant height, pod per plant and seed yield which are desirable for heterosis breeding and may be exploited in hybrid seed production. Both additive and non-additive genetic constitution were important for seed per pod and thousand kernel weight. Among the 7 female lines, RGS003 revealed maximum GCA effects for seed yield, thousand kernel weight, seed per pod and number of branches. Among the testers, Option500 was desirable as it manifested higher estimates of GCA effects for seed yield and thousand kernel weight. Three cross-combiners Magent × Opera, Elect × Option500 and Shiralee × Opera were found to be the best specific crosses for seed yield


Aslam Khan, S., Ahmad, H., Khan, A., Saeed, M., Khan, S. M., Ahmad, B. (2009). Using line × tester analysis for earliness and plant height traits in Sunflower (Helianthus Annus L.). Recent Research in Science and Technology, 1(5): 202-206.
Ceyran, E., Ali Avci, M., Karasas, S. (2008). Line × tester analysis in pea (Pisum sativum L.): Identification of superior parents for seed yield and its components. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(16): 2810-2817.
Downey, R.K., Rimer, S.R. (1993). Agronomic improvement in oilseed brassicas. Advances in Agronomy, 50:1–150.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2010). Crop production statistics. http://www.
Karademir, C., E., Karademir, R., Ekinci, O., Gencer. (2009). Combining ability estimates and heterosis for yield and fiber quality of Cotton in line × tester design. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj, 37 (2): 228-233.
Kempthorneh, O. (1957). An introduction to genetic statistics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York;Chapman and Hall, London.
Leon, J. (1991). Heterosis and mixing effects in winter oilseed rape. Crop Science, 31: 281-284.
Mather, K., Jinks, J. L. (1982). Biometrical genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
McGee, K.P., Brown, J. (1995). Investigation of F1 hybrids performance in fall- and spring planted canola. In Proc. 9th Int. Rapeseed Confr., 4– 10 July, 1995. Cambridge, U.K., pp. 116-118.
Mohanraj, K., Gopalan, A., Shanmuganathan, M. (2006). Genetic parameters in hydrocyanic acid content in forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(1): 59-62.
Panhawar, S.A, Baloch, M.J., Jatoi, W.A., Veesar, N.F., Majeedano, M.S. (2008). Combining ability estimates from line ×tester mating design in upland cotton. Proceeding. Pakistan Academy of Science, 45(2): 69-74.
Rameeh, V. (2010). Combining ability and factor analysis in F2 diallel crosses of rapeseed varieties. Plant Breeding and Seed Science, 62: 73-83.
Ramsay, L.D., Bradshaw, J.E., Kearsey, M.J. (1994). The inheritance of quantitative traits in Swedes (Brassica napus L. spp. Rapifera) diallel analysis of dry matter yield. Journal of Genetic and Breeding, 48: 253-257.
Sachan, J.N., Singh, B. (1988). Genetic analysis of quantitative characters in a cross of Indian mustard. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 58: 176-9.
Saeed, A., Aslam Chaudhry, M., Saeed, N., Khaliq, I., Johar, M. Z. (2001). Line × tester analysis for some morpho-physiological traits in bread wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 3(4):444-447.
Singh, P., Narayanan, S. S. (1993) Biometrical techniques in plant breeding. 1st Edn Kalayani publishers, New Delhi, India.
Singh, N.K., Kumar, A. (2004). Combining ability analysis to identify suitable parents for heterotic rice hybrid breeding. IRRN, 29(1): 21-22.
Sivagamasundhari, S., Irulappan, I., Arumugam, R., Jayasankar, S. (1992). Combining ability in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench). South Indian Horticulture, 40: 21-27.
Thakur, H. L., Sagwal, J. C. (1997). Heterosis and combining ability in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Indian Journal of Genetics, 57: 163-167.
Tyagi, A.P, Praduman, L. (2005). Line × tester analysis in Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). The South Pacific Journal of Natural Science, 23: 30-36.
Wang, J.S., Wang, X.F., Zhang, Y.F., Zhang, Z., Tian, J.H., Li, D.R. (2007). Study on heterosis among subspecies or varieties in B. campestris L. Proceedings of the 12th Interna-tional Rapeseed Congress Wuhan, (TRCW’07), China: Science Press USA, PP: 108-110.
Weerasekara, R. C., Jagadeeaha, M. C., WAali, P. M., Salimath, R. M., Kalappanvar, I. K. H. (2008). Combining ability of yield and yield components in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science, 21(2): 187-189.