Document Type: Original Article


1 MSc Student, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Urmia, Urmia, Iran

2 Professors, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran


This study was designed to investigate the effects of different levels of Tarragon powder on general performance and Anetometric, properties of digestive system of male broiler chickens. 200 one-day-old Ross 308 male broiler chickens in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments and 5 replicates per treatment and 10 birds in each replicate were used. Experimental diets were set on the basis of corn-soy-wheat and Ross 308 broiler chickens nutritional requirements tables by the use of UFFDA ration formulation software. Treatments were: base diet (control), base diet + 0.125% of Tarragon powder, base diet + 0.25% of Tarragon powder, base diet + 0.5% of Tarragon powder. The results of experiment showed that experimental dietaries caused no significant difference between the Feed Intake of different treatments statistically (P>0.05). The consumption of experimental rations decreased body weight significantly in 0.5% Tarragon treatment when compared with control treatment in 1- 42 days old (P<0.05). The consumption of experimental rations caused statistically significant increase of 0.5 %Tarragon powder treatment’s conversion ratio when compared with control treatment and 0.125 % Tarragon powder treatment in 1- 42 days old (P<0.01). The results of the experiment showed that the consumption of experimental rations didn’t have any effect on the relative weight of digestive system’s accessories significantly (gizzard, Bursa, stomach and Pancreas) and weight and length of digestive parts’ (Duodenum, Jejunum, Ileum, Secum, Rectum, and whole small intestine) in different treatments in the whole process of raising in 1 to 42 days old (P<0.05). It seems that adding Artemisia dracunculus (Tarragon) powder 0. 5 % level has had negative effect on the performance of broiler chickens in the whole process of husbandry, but in comparison with its effect on digestive parts’ weight and length, it has had no significant effect on them.


- Al-Attar, A. M. 2006. Comparative physiological study on the effect of rosemary, tarragon and bay leaves extract on serum lipid profile of quail, Coturnix coturnix. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 13: 91- 98.
-Cross, D.E., R.M. Mcdevitt, K. Hillman, and T. Acamovic. 2007. The effect of herbs and their associatedessential oils on performance, dietary digestibility and gut microflora in chickens from 7 to 28 days of age.Br. Poult. Sci. 48: 496-506.
-Ciftci, M., T. Gϋler, B. Dalkiliç, and N. Ertas. 2005. The effect of anise oil (Pimpinella anisum L.) on broiler performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 4: 851-855.
-Ayoughi .F., M. A. Sahari,H. Naghdibadi. 2011. Chemical compsitions of Essential oils of Artemisia dracunculus L. and an Evaluation of their Antioxidative Effects Agricultural. Sci.Tech. 13:79-88.
-Tipu M. A., M. S. Akhtar, M. I. Anjum And M. L. Raja. 2006. New dimension of medicinal plants as animal feed. Pakistan Vet. J. 26: 144-148.
-Meepagala, K.M., Sturtz, G.and Wedge,D.A., 2002. Antifungal constituent of the essential oil fraction of Artemisia dracunculus L. Var. dracunculus. Journal of Agricultural and food chemistry,50:6989-6992.
-Oblskiy,D ., Pischel,I ., Feistel. B., Glotov.N., Heinrich.M.2011. A Critical Review of Its TraditionalUse, Chemical Composition, Pharmacology, and Safety .Journal of Agricultural and food chemistry,17:45.
-Romila, R.M.A., 2001. Hacked By SOSO H. H Iraqi-Cracker. M.Sci. Thesis, Dept. of Biochemistry,University of Cairo Egypt.
-Vienna, Ch. F., and coworkers. 2005. Assessment of plants/herbs, plant / herbextracts and their naturally or synthetically produced components as “additives” for use in animal production. CFT/EFSA/FEEDAP.
-Yusrizal, and T. C. Chen. 2003. Effect of adding chicory fructans in feed on broiler growth performance, serum cholesterol and intestinal length. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2:214-219.