The Integration of Dry Matter Intake and Residual Feed Intake into a Selection Index for Dairy Cattle

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 Department of Animal Nutrition School of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics Autonomous University of the State of Mexico Toluca, Edo de México, México

Abstract
As production costs continue to rise, the global population expands, and sustainability becomes a more pressing concern, enhancing the efficiency of dairy cows has emerged as a vital objective for the dairy industry. Recent evaluations have examined the implications of including feed efficiency (FE) in a selection index through both indirect selection methods, such as dry matter intake (DMI), and direct selection approaches such as residual feed intake (RFI), utilizing deterministic modelling techniques. Such methods aim to create a more sustainable dairy industry by optimizing resource use and improving overall productivity. The study examined two traits using three different methods: (1) setting the genetic gain of the traits to zero, (2) implementing negative selection pressure, and (3) utilizing positive selection pressure. To assess the effects of integrating FE into a selection index, changes in both economic and genetic gains were analysed. The findings revealed that enhancing FE through direct selection based on residual feed intake yielded the most favourable results. This approach provided the highest overall economic benefits and also led to positive outcomes in production and FE selection. Overall, focusing on direct selection for FE proved to be the most effective strategy among the scenarios evaluated. The evaluation of how the weights of relative indexes change, along with the anticipated effectiveness of the suggested selection indexes compared to a baseline index, has been conducted. This assessment also included the response of indices to selection and the effects on various traits due to selection. Notably, the most significant change in the index response to selection occurred when aiming to increase dry matter intake (DMI), leading to an 8.42% enhancement in the response index. Conversely, attempts to decrease DMI resulted in a detrimental effect, causing a 7.68% decline in the response index. This illustrates the complexities involved in selection index management, highlighting those strategies focused on improving DMI can yield positive outcomes, while reductions in DMI may negatively influence overall selection effectiveness. Over time, the cumulative effects of selection can lead to a significant reduction in daily dry matter intake, ranging from 0.16 kg to 2.7 kg, all while sustaining production levels. The findings suggest that while residual feed intake (RFI) has minimal influence on the existing efficiency metrics, it could be a valuable trait to consider breeding programs aimed at enhancing feed efficiency in dairy cattle. This research sheds light on the potential long-term benefits of prioritizing feed efficiency through the lens of RFI, indicating that such selection practices may yield substantial improvements in overall productivity and sustainability within dairy operations.

Graphical Abstract

The Integration of Dry Matter Intake and Residual Feed Intake into a Selection Index for Dairy Cattle

Keywords

Subjects


OPEN ACCESS

©2026 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Sami Publishing Company remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Sami Publishing Company

[1]. Hemme, T., Uddin, M.M., Ndambi, O.A., Benchmarking cost of milk production in 46 countries. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2014, 3, 254.
[3]. Pryce, J., Gonzalez-Recio, O., Nieuwhof, G., Wales, W., Coffey, M., Hayes, B., Goddard, M., Hot topic: Definition and implementation of a breeding value for feed efficiency in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, 98(10), 7340-7350.
[4]. Herd, R., Bishop, S., Genetic variation in residual feed intake and its association with other production traits in british hereford cattle. Livestock Production Science, 2000, 63(2), 111-119.
[6]. Richardson, M.R.C., The incorporation of efficiency traits into the canadian dairy selection index, Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph . 2017.
[8]. De Vries, A., Economic trade-offs between genetic improvement and longevity in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017, 100(5), 4184-4192.
[9]. De Haas, Y., Pryce, J., Calus, M., Wall, E., Berry, D., Løvendahl, P., Krattenmacher, N., Miglior, F., Weigel, K., Spurlock, D., Genomic prediction of dry matter intake in dairy cattle from an international data set consisting of research herds in europe, north america, and australasia. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, 98(9), 6522-6534.
[10]. Byskov, M., Fogh, A., Løvendahl, P., Genetic parameters of rumination time and feed efficiency traits in primiparous holstein cows under research and commercial conditions. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017, 100(12), 9635-9642.
[11]. Hardie, L., VandeHaar, M., Tempelman, R., Weigel, K., Armentano, L., Wiggans, G., Veerkamp, R., De Haas, Y., Coffey, M., Connor, E., The genetic and biological basis of feed efficiency in mid-lactation holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017, 100(11), 9061-9075.
[12]. Negussie, E., Mehtiö, T., Mäntysaari, P., Løvendahl, P., Mäntysaari, E., Lidauer, M., Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: When dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios. Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102(8), 7248-7262.
[13]. Pech, C.M., Veerkamp, R., Calus, M., Zom, R., Van Knegsel, A., Pryce, J., De Haas, Y., Genetic parameters across lactation for feed intake, fat-and protein-corrected milk, and liveweight in first-parity holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(9), 5851-5862.
[16]. Kennedy, B., Van der Werf, J., Meuwissen, T., Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science, 1993, 71(12), 3239-3250.
[17]. Lu, Y., Vandehaar, M., Spurlock, D., Weigel, K., Armentano, L., Staples, C., Connor, E., Wang, Z., Bello, N., Tempelman, R., An alternative approach to modeling genetic merit of feed efficiency in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, 98(9), 6535-6551.
[18]. González, L., Tolkamp, B., Coffey, M., Ferret, A., Kyriazakis, I., Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 91(3), 1017-1028.
[19]. Van Arendonk, J., Nieuwhof, G., Vos, H., Korver, S., Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers. Livestock Production Science, 1991, 29(4), 263-275.
Volume 14, Issue 1
January and February 2026
Pages 1-12

  • Receive Date 12 July 2025
  • Revise Date 09 August 2025
  • Accept Date 28 August 2025

Article View 41,788
PDF Download 40,773